'%20d='M69.364%2019.146c36.687%2027.806%2076.147%2084.186%2090.636%20114.439%2014.489-30.253%2053.948-86.633%2090.636-114.439C277.107-.917%20320-16.44%20320%2032.957c0%209.865-5.603%2082.875-8.889%2094.729-11.423%2041.208-53.045%2051.719-90.071%2045.357%2064.719%2011.12%2081.182%2047.953%2045.627%2084.785-80%2082.874-106.667-44.333-106.667-44.333s-26.667%20127.207-106.667%2044.333c-35.555-36.832-19.092-73.665%2045.627-84.785-37.026%206.362-78.648-4.149-90.071-45.357C5.603%20115.832%200%2042.822%200%2032.957%200-16.44%2042.893-.917%2069.364%2019.147Z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
This is a really welcome step. A properly open Next.js is good for the framework and the ecosystem. Vendor lock-in – real or perceived – is not really an option anymore. I'm glad we're working together on this.
Next.js@nextjs.org
Next.js is used by millions of developers across every major cloud. Making it work well everywhere is on us. Here's what we've built with Netlify, Cloudflare, OpenNext, AWS, and Google Cloud, and the commitments we're making. nextjs.org/nextjs-acro...
nextjs.org